Some of you may be familiar with the “What Teens Want” conference that I had mentioned in a previous entry. It’s a gathering for marketers that focuses on emerging teen preferences and tendencies, with pricey videos and recordings of the panel sessions available for purchase.
(IceRocket worked great, except it did put the most important entry last on the results page – Guy Kawasaki’s blog entry with the original link!)
The only thing that bothered me is he seemed to be steering people away from any admissions about underground, grey market or piracy-type media habits (although this may have been for their own protection… the RIAA & MPAA has ears everywhere).
Lately, I have been noticing that many teens do not use email. See, e.g., here and here. I have learned that emails (not just mine, but emails generally) are a burden to my 18-year-old daughter. She doesn't like to respond to emails. She prefers texting. Or talking on the phone.
University age and younger, it seems, send SMS messages as a conversation, and only use email to communicate with, err, old people.
It confirms research reported last month from Forrester that reveals the key to reaching this important demographic group is through online communication.
On this list of podcasts from NMK’s excellent Content 2.0 conference in June, scroll down to find the panel “YOUNG PEOPLE & MEDIA: Invisible Culture” (click here to download the mp3). Finally, in the excellent Ibiblio speaker series, here’s a discussion with Danah Boyd on how young people negotiate the presentation of self in online contexts. The mp4 file is a bit huge, but it’s definitely worth the massive download.
Shouldn’t we know how kids are using technology if we want to reach them? If we can understand how they interact with and learn from technology, couldn’t we design better ways to teach them? We’re not training kids to work in a factory, we’re educating them to be citizens of the 21st century. For a 2 ½ minute, entertaining illustration, see Education Today and Tomorrow. That's also to show that Youtube does have educational value. In fact there is a group just for educators: http://www.youtube.com/group/K12.
(That one had the best synopsis I found of the video content itself.)
The Mobile Life 2006 survey Youth Report paints a good picture of how mobile technology is changing the lives of young people in the UK (IT claims to be the biggest survey of its kind, with over 1250 11 to 17 year-olds included.) http://www.mobilelife2006.co.uk/PDF/Mobile%20Life%20Youth%20Report%202006%20Colour.pdf
The other thing that was interesting to me was how much influence and control the college students’ parents still appeared to exert in their lives. One student had to close her MySpace account because her parents didn’t like it. Several others apparently have their cell phone bills paid by their parents. That’s a different experience than I had at university, certainly.
I encourage everyone to watch this, especially those of you who consider yourself tech-savvy, as it will bring into strong relief the fact that most [young] people are clueless. Case in point, Q: “What browser do you use?” A: “Google.”
A few of these were from two excellent articles referencing the piece:
Marketers Beware: Gen Y Is Coming
Marketing To College Students 101
I don’t necessarily agree with any/all of these commentaries, but I did appreciate the range . . . did you watch the video? What do you think about teen media habits and marketing?